โญ 10/10 Life Sciences Learning • B10logy = 10 out of 10 in Biology • High-Yield Visual Notes Across 23 Disciplines Explore Subjects →

Exp 5: In Silico Molecular Docking & Binding Affinity Profiling: AutoDock Vina Grid Search & Binding Free Energy (Delta G)

Experiment 05Molecular DockingDrug Discovery

In Silico Molecular Docking & Binding Affinity Profiling: AutoDock Vina Grid Search & Binding Free Energy ($Delta G$)

Duration: 5 Hours • Computational Drug Design Lab
๐ŸŽฏ Experimental Aim & Learning Objectives
To prepare macromolecular receptor targets and small-molecule ligand files; define 3D active site affinity search grid boxes; execute flexible-ligand semi-flexible receptor docking simulations using AutoDock Vina; cluster conformational binding poses; and calculate binding free energies ($Delta G_{text{bind}}$), dissociation constants ($K_d$), and intermolecular non-bonded interaction networks.
๐Ÿ”ฌ Theoretical Foundation & Thermodynamic Principles

Molecular docking predicts the preferred orientation (pose) and binding affinity of a small molecule drug candidate within an enzyme’s binding pocket:

  • AutoDock Vina Scoring Function: Evaluates the empirical binding free energy ($Delta G_{text{bind}}$) using an optimized scoring function:
    $$Delta G_{text{bind}} = Delta G_{text{vdW}} + Delta G_{text{hbond}} + Delta G_{text{electrostatic}} + Delta G_{text{desolvation}} + Delta G_{text{torsional}}$$
    Vina combines a machine-learning-inspired scoring function with an iterated local search (Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno, BFGS) optimization algorithm.
  • Thermodynamic Relation to Affinity: Binding free energy is directly proportional to the thermodynamic equilibrium association constant ($K_a$) and dissociation constant ($K_d$):
    $$Delta G = – R cdot T cdot ln(K_a) = R cdot T cdot ln(K_d)$$
    At $T = 298.15text{ K}$, a more negative $Delta G$ signifies tighter binding. Every $-1.36text{ kcal/mol}$ change in $Delta G$ corresponds to a 10-fold increase in binding affinity ($K_d$).
  • Preparation Steps:
    • Receptor: Remove crystallographic waters, add polar hydrogens, assign Kollman/Gasteiger partial charges, save as PDBQT format.

    • Ligand: Define rotatable bonds, detect root, assign partial charges, save as PDBQT format.
IN SILICO MOLECULAR DOCKING: AUTODOCK VINA & BINDING FREE ENERGY (ΔG)Receptor Active Site & 3D Affinity Grid BoxReceptor Catalytic Binding Pocket (PDB ID: 1IEP)Grid Box: 20 × 20 × 20 ÅH-Bond (Thr315)H-Bond (Glu286)AUTODOCK VINA EMPIRICAL SCORING FUNCTION1. Binding Free Energy (ΔG_bind):ΔG = ΔG_vdw + ΔG_hbond + ΔG_elect + ΔG_desolv + ΔG_torsExpressed in kcal/mol (More negative ΔG = higher affinity)2. Thermodynamic Relation to Dissociation Constant (K_d):ΔG = − R × T × ln(K_a) = R × T × ln(K_d)3. AutoDock Vina Conformation Pose Cluster Table:

ModeAffinity (kcal/mol)RMSD l.b. (Å)RMSD u.b. (Å)1−9.8 kcal/mol0.000 (Top Pose)0.0002−9.3 kcal/mol1.4252.1183−8.7 kcal/mol2.1103.450

Figure 1.5: AutoDock Vina receptor 3D affinity grid box setup, intermolecular hydrogen-bonding contacts, and binding free energy ($Delta G_{ ext{bind}}$) pose ranking table.
๐Ÿงช Computational Tools & Structural Data
  • Software: AutoDock Vina 1.2+, AutoDockTools (ADT / MGLTools), Open Babel, and PyMOL / Discovery Studio Visualizer.
  • Benchmark Target-Ligand System: Human Abl Kinase (PDB ID: 1IEP) and the anti-leukemia small molecule inhibitor Imatinib (Gleevec).
๐Ÿ“‹ Step-by-Step Computational Protocol
  1. Receptor Preparation: Download 1IEP.pdb. In PyMOL, strip crystallographic water molecules, co-crystallized buffers, and alternative conformations: remove solvent. In ADT, add polar hydrogens and assign Kollman charges. Export as receptor.pdbqt.
  2. Ligand Preparation: Acquire 3D SDF structure of Imatinib from PubChem. Convert to PDBQT using Open Babel: obabel imatinib.sdf -O ligand.pdbqt --gen3d -p 7.4. Check that all rotatable single bonds are parameterized.
  3. Grid Box Definition: Center the 3D affinity box on the ATP-binding pocket (coordinates around co-crystallized ligand):

    center_x = 10.5, center_y = 18.2, center_z = 56.4; size_x = 22, size_y = 22, size_z = 22 Å. Save in vina_config.txt with exhaustiveness = 16.
  4. Vina Execution: Run simulation:

    vina --receptor receptor.pdbqt --ligand ligand.pdbqt --config vina_config.txt --out docked_poses.pdbqt --log docking.log
  5. Pose Analysis & Hydrogen Bond Profiling: Load top pose (Mode 1) and receptor in PyMOL. Identify hydrogen bonds ($< 3.2text{ AA}$) and hydrophobic interactions with pocket gatekeeper residues (Thr315, Glu286, Asp381).
๐Ÿ“Š Representative Docking Affinity & Interaction Data
Conformation Mode$Delta G_{text{bind}}$ (kcal/mol)Predicted $K_d$RMSD lower bound ($text{AA}$)Key Interacting Residues
Mode 1 (Top Pose)−11.2 kcal/mol$6.1 text{ nM}$0.000H-bonds: Glu286 (2.1 Å), Asp381 (2.4 Å), Thr315 (2.8 Å)
Mode 2−10.5 kcal/mol$20.1 text{ nM}$1.284H-bonds: Glu286, Met318 backbone
Mode 3−9.8 kcal/mol$65.8 text{ nM}$2.140Hydrophobic contact with Phe382 of DFG

Pharmacological Assessment: Mode 1 exhibits high sub-nanomolar affinity ($Delta G = -11.2text{ kcal/mol}$), accurately reproducing the crystallographic binding mode of Imatinib within the inactive DFG-out conformation of Abl kinase.

{reading_nav}

๐Ÿ“– Key Terms & Comprehensive Glossary

Key Terms in this Lecture • Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Master the essential vocabulary, core concepts, and biochemical keywords covered in this chapter. Click any key term to inspect its rigorous definition in the Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Comprehensive Glossary.

โญ 10/10 Concept Clarity
Back to Bioinformatics Laboratory Manual: Algorithms, Modeling & Omics Pipelines โšก One Night Revision → Explore All Disciplines